6 Unfortunately, he failed to do so for certain reasons. He was invited to attend a further investigation regarding the irregularities in the Globe and Smart Projects. Later, petitioner received three letters of invitation dated January 24, 2005, Februand February 15, 2005. Petitioner, however, answered that the go signal was given by someone from the Technical Services Department but he could not remember who the person was considering that the approval was made through a telephone conversation and he failed to identify the voice of the person he was then talking to. 4 It specifically asked him for the name of the person who ordered or approved the energization of the Globe cell sites and the installation of the KWH Meter at Brgy. The Committee invited petitioner, among others, to shed some light on the matter. MARELCO, thus, made an inquiry through an Ad-hoc Committee created for such purpose. It came to its knowledge that several Globe cell sites were illegally tapped to the service connection of member-consumers near the area. Sometime in 2004, MARELCO discovered certain highly irregular activities committed by some of its employees regarding the Smart and Globe Projects. At the time of his alleged illegal termination on March 21, 2005, he occupied the position of Sub-Office Chief. Petitioner was hired by respondent Marinduque Electric Cooperative, Inc. 112151, affirming with modification the Decision 2 of the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) in NLRC Case No. Subject to review under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court at the instance of Jimmy Paez (petitioner) is the FebruDecision 1 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R. MARINDUQUE ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., WILLIAM BOBIS, BEETHOVEN AREVALO, JOEL PALATINO, AND CARMENCITA GAAN, RESPONDENTS.
0 kommentar(er)
